Bush lied, people died. There were no weapons of mass destruction.
On the heels of this story:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html
and this followup:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/07/world/middleeast/-more-than-600-reported-chemical-weapons-exposure-in-iraq-pentagon-acknowledges.html?_r=0
comes this story about chemical weapons in Iraq:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/16/world/cia-is-said-to-have-bought-and-destroyed-iraqi-chemical-weapons.html?_r=1&assetType=nyt_now
So there were chemical weapons in Iraq?
Not saying that justifies the war, but it does cast doubt on one of the key arguments of the left.
No comments:
Post a Comment